I’ve been actively writing and presenting over the last few months on the changing B2B marketing landscape. And I’ll be talking more about this subject throughout the Fall at the B2B Marketing University series that I’m hosting together with my colleagues at Silverpop (please join us).
A great deal of the focus of my dialogue so far has been on the evolution of marketing technology, but it’s impossible to talk about a changing environment for marketing technology without talking about how the nature of the B2B buyer also is rapidly changing. The two are inextricably intertwined in a new reality that is both a cause and effect of the digital age we live in.
But where is the hard data that this evolution is really occurring? We’re changing how we go to market — and there is plenty of data pointing to shifting spending by marketers — but how do we know that our shifted spending will better align with B2B buyers’ shifting needs and preferences?
There are quite a few data points that support this evolution; however, they’re often difficult to unearth. Often they are buried or confused within consumer-focused studies on buying trends, and sometimes the consumer data even contradicts the B2B reality. Marketing technology analyst and author David Raab hit on this in a recent round-up of many of these ‘mixed’ consumer/B2B surveys on his Customer Experience Matrix blog. And a major call-out from his piece was just this discrepancy: “Many [data points] are contradictory …,” commented Raab.
So how do we better articulate the unique and changing nature of the B2B buyer — separate from the broader consumer perspective? How do we nail down (real) evidence that the nature of the B2B buyer has changed?
Given the importance of these data and insights to my work, I spent some time updating my perspective to make sure that as B2B marketers we’re on the firmest ground possible. It’s critical that we really understand in an accurate and granular way how best to address the ‘brave new world’ of B2B marketing that I believe is emerging. The good news is that in the process I ran across some very interesting studies and insights, which I’m happy to share.
So first I’ll tackle a definition of how B2B buying behavior has changed, and then I’ll present data points from cutting edge research on the topic I believe illustrates this new reality.
What exactly is the change that has occurred in B2B buying behavior?
As a starting point, let me say that I believe the fundamental buying cycle — i.e., the stages buyers typically go through to make a decision — has not changed. I talked a bit about this in a recent blog post on the Silverpop Demand Generation Blog via the concept of ‘Customer Centered Selling’ that former (and legendary) XEROX sales trainer Robert Jolles has written about.
I still believe this cycle exists, in perpetuity; however, as I outlined in the Demand-Gen blog piece, when and where buyers engage with in-house sales and marketing resources versus external resources is what has fundamentally changed.
In fact, the last decade has brought a rapid (r)evolution in the alignment of resources and power — something I detailed in a recent guest piece on the ReachForce blog:
There are many challenges facing B2B marketers today, but they are almost all traceable to one inflection point — a fundamental, Internet-age shift in power that has taken place. Today, the B2B ‘buying unit’ has immense information-based resources at its disposal. Couple this with a corporate accountability and transparency mindset, and the result is a B2B buyer that is now calling the shots … not the B2B vendor.
The implication is a new B2B marketing dynamic that demands responding to customer ‘pull’ over a traditional marketing ‘push’ mentality. …
Buyers increasingly set the ground rules on when and where they will engage. Buyers also increasingly turn to trusted third parties for education, not sales people … whom they engage as an almost final stage in their process. This means B2B marketers must focus heavily on ‘getting found,’ nurturing prospects and managing pre-sales buyer dialogue.
This is a critical re-framing of the B2B buyer/seller relationship. Much has been written about how sales and marketing strategy is evolving — becoming more sophisticated via CRM and marketing automation. Yet this is not an asynchronous evolution, and buyers are setting the pace … and getting ahead of sales and marketing organizations.
This is something that SiriusDecisions — an analyst firm that covers innovation in sales and marketing strategies — further clarified in a recent post on their corporate blog:
Buying 2.0 is a better metaphor for the buying/selling interactions of today’s selling environment as the hunter has become the hunted. Buyers are more informed and seek information independent of sales. Buyers have access to overwhelming amounts of information, but seek intelligence they can trust to support their decision making process. How sales people want to sell has little impact on how buyers are choosing to buy.
What is the evidence that the nature of the B2B buyer is changing?
To answer this question, I spent some time reviewing recent research and reports by a number of firms that cover B2B marketing. Below is my major synthesis of the dynamics that define this re-shaped B2B buyer nature, backed up by studies I think help us better believe in these dynamics.
> B2B buyers are increasingly turning to online sources, earlier in their process, to research purchases before ever calling a ‘live’ sales rep: There’s a lot of evidence that the B2B buyer is using a variety of channels to access industry peers’ insights — insights that will ultimately shape their buying decision — via Internet-based/virtual mechanisms. This speaks not only to the rise of social media, but also to that of other forums, such as virtual trade shows.
“[T]he poor economy has forced a shift away from face-to-face events and trade shows, and toward their virtual or online counterparts,” explains Bill Gadless in a post on the B2B Web Strategy blog that summarized a recent research report by MarketingSherpa.
This “2009-10 B2B Marketing: Benchmark Report” by MarketingSherpa, which interviewed technology buyers who make purchases greater than $25,000 (i.e., large, consultative purchases), highlights the significant and increasing usage of online mediums by B2B buyers versus traditional media and/or face-to-face events. The chart below (used with permission) points to this trend:
The MarketingSherpa data speak to a new preference for online. Additional research from Enquiro highlights how early in the B2B buying process online sources are now consulted — shaping early perceptions.
Enquiro recently launched a project it is calling The Buyersphere Project, which is focused on capturing the changing nature of the B2B buyer. As part of this project, Enquiro published a white paper, titled “Integrated Persuasion: Online and Offline,” that further supports this point:
It seems that it’s common to take to partially defined need and flesh it out through online research. Therefore, online can be a powerful influence at these early stages. The result of the research is fundamental in determining potential candidates, defining comparison criteria and formalizing the purchase plan. It’s important to understand that although this research happens early, there is typically already at least one vendor that’s embedded the consideration set, a seed planted there either by past experience, approved vendor status or marketing. This existing vendor mindshare can influence the online resources consulted, the words used in web searches and the vendor websites visited. Online research confirms their position and adds other candidates.
The Enquiro white paper illustrated this reality via the following graph (used with permission), which captures the ongoing role of online — especially at the earlier stages:
> B2B buyers are increasingly leveraging social media — especially peer communication, such as Twitter, blogs, etc. — in the information collection phase of the buying process: Not only are B2B buyers increasingly turning to online sources, but they are seeking via the online world the same types of peer references and word-of-mouth they have always relied upon. This is where social media is playing an increasing role in the B2B buying process.
David Raab recently noted on his Customer Experience Matrix blog, “[S]ocial media have grown from virtually nothing to nearly 20% of online time over the past few years. This matters because social media are an alternative gateway to finding Web content: Instead of doing a search, I can ask my online community for information or recommendations.”
A 2007 Forrester / Erickson Barnett white paper noted of B2B buyers, “[W]e found this group to be 1.3 times more likely to engage in social media activities for business purposes than for personal.” The paper also reported that “[w]hile 44% of adults, according to Forrester, have no participation in social media, only 9% of the B2B marketers who responded [to the survey] were inactive.”
More recently, Laura Ramos and Oliver Young with Forrester’s Technology Industry/B2B group, published a very interesting report titled “The Social Technographics of Business Buyers.” (See Forrester-posted SlideShare presentation below.) They interviewed “more than 1,200 technology buyers in the U.S., Canada, France, Germany and the U.K. with 100 employees or more in seven major industries,” according to Ramos in a BtoB Magazine write-up of the top-level research findings.
Josh Bernoff commented on these report findings via Forrester’s Groundswell blog: “91% of … technology decision-makers [are] Spectators — the highest number I’ve ever seen in a Social Technographics Profile. This means you can count on the fact that your buyers are reading blogs, watching user generated video, and participating in other social media. Note that 69% of them said they were using this technology for business purposes.”
> B2B buyers are pursuing their buying process more ‘massively multi-channel’ than ever before; however, channel weightings and their sequence vary by the phase of the buying process: “Unlike consumers who tend to lean more strongly one way or the other, the B2B buyer tends to now converge channels into an integrated buying cycle and process. And, I bet confusing the heck out of many marketing departments,” commented Tony Zambito in a post on his Buyer Persona Insights blog earlier this year.
This is absolutely the new reality of B2B buying, and it is both multi-channel online, as well as a blend of online and offline data gathering.
Enquiro released research in 2007 that points to some of this pattern. The chart below (used with permission) captures shifting emphasis on different mediums over the life of the B2B buying cycle, but what is noteworthy is that all mediums are consulted in parallel at all stages.
The Enquiro chart also hints at the sequencing of channels in the buying process — something Akin Arikan covers in his book, Multichannel Marketing. He makes some great points about maintaining focus and control in a multi-channel marketing environment. “[I]t is one thing to interact through multiple channels in parallel,” comments Arikan. “It is quite another to fuse those activities together in an intelligent way to maximize response and conversion rates.” Akin goes on to point out that today “[b]uyers are multichannel beings. Buying cycles are cross-channel.”
> B2B buyers manifest themselves more than ever as a complex, savvy ‘buying unit,’ rather than simply as a single decision-maker: Not only are B2B buyers integrating multiple online and offline channels and opinion sources, but they also are operating in a more sophisticated fashion than ever. A big-ticket purchase will be evaluated by a team of people, ranging from the initial recommender, to someone making the business case, to a purchasing agent, to legal/finance/etc. It’s a complex process to navigate.
“Relationship marketing is the key here and different levels of the organization participate in the buying/selling process especially if the sale is a big ticket sale,” commented Lowell D’Souza in a recent post on his Marketing Bones blog site.
Enquiro highlighted this in another white paper, ” Maximizing Online: Leveraging Your Online Touch Points,” that further supports this point. Enquiro points to differential involvement of end users — who may have made the initial business case for a purchase — versus those in the procurement group — who are responsible for assessing and negotiating a purchase. This can be seen in the chart below (used with permission).
So what is the impact of all of this change in the nature of the B2B buyer on B2B marketing and on sales and marketing alignment? The most significant impact is the death of the traditional sales funnel and a new approach that must be embraced by B2B marketers — an approach I’ll cover in a post on the Silverpop Demand Generation blog later this week.
[…] Nailing Down Evidence That the Nature of the B2B Buyer Has Changed « Propelling Brands propellingbrands.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/nailing-down-evidence-that-the-nature-of-the-b2b-buyer-has-changed – view page – cached I’ve been actively writing and presenting over the last few months on the changing B2B marketing landscape. And I’ll be talking more about this subject throughout the Fall at the B2B Marketing University series that I’m hosting together with my colleagues at Silverpop (please join us). — From the page […]
Hi Adam,
A key role for marketing is to be the advocate of the customer.
Without customer insight marketing lacks the compass to guide sales and marketing plans.
With the profusion of online interactions, our customer insights should deepen.
Thanks for a great recap of the research and let’s hope that there will be more to share.
@RobertLesser
@ Robert – Thanks for the comments.
I agree. It’s critical to remind ourselves that the customer must be at the center of our B2B sales and marketing strategies — which means we really need to understand the changing nature of the B2B buyer.
Appreciate the dialogue.
Great post Adam. Thanks for summarizing this all so clearly. Eager to see you post telling us where to go from here.
@ David – Thanks for the comment.
Here is my follow-up post + conversation w/ Meg Heuer at SiriusDecisions on the Silverpop Demand Generation blog:
http://www.silverpop.com/blogs/demand-generation/b2b-marketing-strategy/so-the-nature-of-the-b2b-buyer.html
Also, there has been a lot of interest in this blog piece, which I appreciate. Hat tips to the following posts that also continued the dialogue:
http://blog.bridgegroupinc.com/blog/tabid/47760/bid/10601/default.aspx?t=633894922849845769
http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/09/marketing-automation-weekly-wrap-up_25.html
Bly mentions in one of his books I came across years ago that B2B direct marketing required a chain of at least 5 documents or touchpoint contacts, whether print or online.
Complex buying processes likewise would proliferate these document chains, one for each stakeholder in the buy.
Your post does hint at having a product management persona for not only the user and the economic buyer, but others in the purchasing process.
The documents chain, a fulfillment chain, would be for the initial sale. Subsequent subscriptions and upgrades would be directed at the user, so a single document would get that job done. Subscriptions should become habitual and require no notice to the user or customer.
[…] their process, to research purchases before ever calling a ‘live’ sales rep", according to Nailing Down Evidence That the Nature of the B2B Buyer Has Changed on Propelling Brands. That's almost certainly true. But I've also seen it used as […]
Great stuff, Adam. You’ve shown us several things that B2B marketers are thinking about – or *should* be thinking about.
You talked about the shift in power from the seller to the buyer. Amongst all pull media, I think Search has played the biggest part in that shift. Buyers can find almost anything in an instant by searching, from product comparisons to Twitter posts which tarnish or polish the perception of your brand.
But would you say that improved marketing automation software, analytics, etc. are now pulling the power back towards the (b2b) marketer? After all, we can now read online behavior with excruciating detail and anticipate the intent of the buyer even before they get there. Marketers are starting to become aware that they can target the buyer with great precision throughout the sales cycle, also tailored to the distinct buyer roles within an organization.
Yet online marketing can quickly fail if we forget about the psychology behind the whole process, and our BuyerSphere study showed this. In organizational buying, it’s about risk avoidance. And even though we’d like to have a clear, trackable selling cycle, there’s actually much more going on beneath the surface than we think. Much of it doesn’t happen online. That makes it more challenging but fascinating at the same time. For example, even though Enquiro specializes in online, our own research showed that offline face-to-face time with prospects can be pivotal for some types of purchases.
The challenge: to tie these realities together well when marketing online.
Adam, many thanks for the references to our research. For anyone who’s interested, the BuyerSpere study is actually comprised of 6 papers and webinars, all at: http://www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch
cheers,
@andrewspoeth
@ David – This is a great observation, and it speaks to the importance of rationalizing your campaigns around the buyer/buying unit.
If we don’t think in this context, we wouldn’t be aware that a.) we even need to talk to this audience or b.) what we should say to them when we are talking to them.
Great call-out.
@ Andrew – Great insights … and that is, indeed, the balance we are seeking to strike.
I think that today the buyer has the upper hand, but there is tremendous opportunity for B2B marketers to regain their edge — first by realizing this shift is happening, second by changing their strategies and third by adopting systems and processes to manage this shifted approach.
Thanks also for being so generous with sharing your research. Really love the Buyersphere project.
Thanks for referencing our blog and great insights.
Serena
After I read, I’m totally enlighted with you writing. This king of era Internet Marketing has grown so quickly so we must provide quick solution to conquer the market.
Nicely done writing. Two Thumbs up! 🙂
Adam,
As usual you display great thoughts, and more importantly, things to consider in our own B to B marketing strategy.
Keep up the good work! 🙂
[…] October 30, 2009 by Adam Needles I’ve been actively speaking over the past few weeks about a new strategic mindset I believe B2B marketers should adopt today — a ‘mass one-to-one’ strategy. This is a posture where marketing manages scale, targeted, engaged and two-way dialogue with prospects, upstream from sales-team interaction and ultimately with the purpose of paving the way for a sales close. This is much more than mere lead generation; moreover, the growing need for such a strategy really is the natural extension of my recent observations about how the nature of the B2B buyer is changing and the permanent shift thi…. […]
Experts have talked about this before. How many times have you read about the importance of ‘adding value’ for your audience? How many times have you read about ‘building trust’ with your readers/prospects?
Many, many times. You know it well. Every marketing guru has spoken about this topic. I’m sick of hearing it. But it STILL bears repeating.
onlineuniversalwork
[…] Position yourself as a resource to your buyer: In a world where the nature of the B2B buyer has changed, and power has forever shifted from vendor to buyer, it’s more critical than ever to make […]
[…] Position yourself as a resource to your buyer: In a world where the nature of the B2B buyer has changed, and power has forever shifted from vendor to buyer, it’s more critical than ever to make […]
[…] marketers’ greatest challenge lies in responding to a rapidly-changing B2B buyer. A Web 2.0 world has fundamentally changed the dynamics of buyer-vendor interaction. B2B buyers […]
[…] write and speak on my belief that B2B marketers’ greatest challenge lies in responding to a rapidly-changing B2B buyer. A Web 2.0 world has fundamentally changed the dynamics of buyer-vendor interaction. B2B buyers […]
[…] marketers’ greatest challenge lies in responding to a rapidly-changing B2B buyer. A Web 2.0 world has fundamentally changed the dynamics of buyer-vendor interaction. B2B buyers […]
[…] post will detail some of the key dynamics. Yet it’s important to couch these dynamics in the macro environment of the shift in power from buyer to seller. You’ve probably heard me tell this story before: First, the Internet changed the nature […]
[…] By Adam Needles, on February 5th, 2010 A changing B2B marketing environment — where the buyer is more empowered and in control than ever before — is pushing marketers to adopt new approaches. Content marketing is just such a new […]
[…] over the past decade — something I’ve frequently highlighted on this blog and also in a post on my Propelling Brands blog, “Nailing Down Evidence That the Nature of the B2B Buyer Has Changed.” More than […]
[…] some of have blogged about content marketing as fundamentally changing the sales process. I for one believe that getting sales involved with the customer early in the sales cycle is […]
[…] the changing landscape of B2B marketing on this blog for some time now. Our focus has been on the changing B2B buyer and how we can better understand and leverage ‘Buyer 2.0′ (hat tip to SiriusDecisions) […]
[…] than ever — in an environment where the B2B buyer has power and where the nature of the B2B buyer is changing — it’s critical that our demand generation activities have a […]
[…] some of have blogged about content marketing as fundamentally changing the sales process. I for one believe that getting sales involved with the customer early in the sales cycle is […]
[…] you may be off the radar at a critical time when your prospective buyer is making key decisions. Shifts in B2B buyer’s information consumption patterns have turned inbound savvy and email-based nurturing into smarter tactics than ever before. Buyers […]
[…] “Nailing Down Evidence That the Nature of the B2B Buyer Has Changed” | 24 September 2009, Propelling Brands blog […]
[…] we’ve seen increasing acknowledgement that, in a Web 2.0 world, the dynamics of the B2B buyer are shifting and that at the core of these new dynamics are fundamental shifts in buyers’ information […]
[…] Web 2.0 world has substantially changed the dynamics between sellers and buyers – changing the information consumption patterns of B2B buyers and resulting in a new era of buyer powe…. One dynamic is the emerging importance of content and the impetus to adopt new content marketing […]
[…] This third point is perhaps at the core of the other two problems. Our failures with technology and our inability to link activities to revenue outcomes are also linked to the fact that too often we don’t start our marketing thinking, building or planning in the most obvious place. We don’t start with the buyer, and we certainly don’t take into account the major changes in the nature of the buyer over the last decade. […]
[…] this new style of ‘mass one-to-one’ B2B buyer nurturing is buyer education, not selling. I’ve written on many occasions that power has shifted in the current demand generation element from seller to buyer. But this […]
[…] them is the emergence of increasing buyer power and savvy — something I’ve covered in past blog posts. This means B2B marketing and sales teams must become more ‘buyer-centric’ than ever […]
[…] Funnel Via Meg Heuer of SiriusDecisions By aneedles, on September 25th, 2009 Yesterday I published a piece on my personal blog, Propelling Brands, that tackled an important area of inquiry: It’s clear that B2B marketing is rapidly evolving; more recently, the dialogue has shifted […]
[…] sales team. Power has permanently shifted from B2B seller to buyer — something I detailed in a post on my Propelling Brands blog and that I’ve been speaking about at this Fall’s B2B Marketing University series. The […]
[…] Position yourself as a resource to your buyer: In a world where the nature of the B2B buyer has changed, and power has forever shifted from vendor to buyer, it’s more critical than ever to make […]
[…] Marketing? By aneedles, on February 5th, 2010 A changing B2B marketing environment — where the buyer is more empowered and in control than ever before — is pushing marketers to adopt new approaches. Content marketing is just such a new […]
[…] we’ve seen increasing acknowledgement that, in a Web 2.0 world, the dynamics of the B2B buyer are shifting and that at the core of these new dynamics are fundamental shifts in buyers’ information […]
[…] information consumption patterns of buyers: On one hand, the methods through which buyers prefer to interact with our companies has changed. Buyers are less interested in the qualitative relationship than in the past, and they are more […]
[…] the changing landscape of B2B marketing on this blog for some time now. Our focus has been on the changing B2B buyer and how we can better understand and leverage ‘Buyer 2.0′ (hat tip to SiriusDecisions) […]
[…] belief that B2B marketers’ greatest challenge lies in responding to a rapidly-changing B2B buyer. a Web 2.0 world has fundamentally changed the dynamics of buyer-vendor […]
[…] It might be that I can’t part with a classical, microeconomic definition of demand, or maybe it is my belief that marketing investments should ultimately be measured in terms of the net present value (NPV) of the return on these investments. maybe this explains my holistic view. yet I’m not alone in my position. In fact, I think the need for a revised definition of demand generation is closely linked both to evolution in the modern role of B2B marketing and to the handoff occurring from sales to marketing as the steward of the modern B2B buyer in a Web 2.0 world. […]
[…] shift that has occurred in the power balance between Sellers and Buyers. A year ago I published a blog post that dug into the deep numbers proving that the nature of the B2B Buyer has changed. And this past August, I published a follow-up post showing that the lack of Buyer focus is […]
[…] this new style of ‘mass one-to-one’ B2B buyer nurturing is buyer education, not selling. I’ve written on many occasions that power has shifted in the current demand generation element from seller to buyer. But this […]
[…] It might be that I can’t part with a classical, microeconomic definition of demand, or maybe it is my belief that marketing investments should ultimately be measured in terms of the net present value (NPV) of the return on these investments. Maybe this explains my holistic view. Yet I’m not alone in my position. In fact, I think the need for a revised definition of demand generation is closely linked both to evolution in the modern role of B2B marketing and to the handoff occurring from sales to marketing as the steward of the modern B2B buyer in a Web 2.0 world. […]
I’m not at all surprised to find out that tradeshows are plummeting in popularity. In general people use the internet as a substitute for such face to face meetings so they can learn and interact in a low-pressure environment.
[…] machtsverhouding (marketing ondergeschikt, sales on top want verantwoordelijk voor omzet) is aan het verschuiven. Sales had het contact met de klant en dáár gebeurde het, dus waarom zou je veel tijd en geld […]
Great article. The most valuable information marketing can deliver to sales is related to a prospect or customers’ propensity to buy specific products. B2B Purchase Behavior Data–what companies buy and how their behavior changes over time–is the most reliable indicator of a prospects’ intent and/or capacity to buy. Fortunately, B2B purchase behavior data is now available and is rapidly becoming a highly-valuable corporate asset.